Pages

Monday, August 13, 2012

Elephants and rhinos in Australia 'could control damaging wild grasses'



Elephants and rhinoceros should be introduced to the Australian outback to control the impact of damaging wild grasses, according to an Australian professor of environmental change biology. But other Australian academics warned the proposal risked its own set of problems.

Prof David Bowman of the University of Tasmania says the giant African gamba grass, introduced as food for livestock in the 1930s, wreaks havoc on the landscape and provides dangerous fuel for wildfires across northern and central Australia.

"Australia has a deeply troubled ecology and current land management approaches are failing," he said.

Because of its height, gamba grass almost completely replaces native vegetation. Its fuel load is up to eight times greater than that of native grasses meaning it burns with greater intensity and produces substantial greenhouse gases.

Bowman estimates that at least 5% of the Australian continent was burnt in massive fires last year, an area three times the size of England. He says, if unchecked, the gamba grass has the potential to grow to cover an equivalent area of the country.

In an article for Nature magazine, Bowman proposes introducing large herbivores like elephants and rhinoceroses as a way of containing Gamba grass which can grow to four meters in height.

"It is too big for marsupial grazers (kangaroos) and for cattle or buffalo, the largest feral mammals," he said.

"I'm talking about using elephants as a machine or ecological tool to manage this grass," he said in an interview for the Guardian, acknowledging that his proposal is radical and has major risks associated with it.

"You'd use all the sophisticated technology available to manage and husband the elephants, containing and tracking them with GPS collars and tracking their fertility," he said.

Scientists at Charles Darwin University in Darwin acknowledge the urgent need to tackle the spread of gamba grass, which has been declared a pest by the government, but say conventional methods will work.
"There is an urgent need for action but we need to pursue the problem in a conventional, strategic and well-resourced way," according to Dr Samantha Setterfield, associate professor of environmental management and ecology at the university.

"Introducing elephants is a very extreme proposal that would have very significant social and environmental impacts," she said.

"It suggests that we've exhausted the conventional options like the use of common herbicides like roundup which work on gamba grass," she said.

Ricky Spencer, senior lecturer with the Native and Pest Animal unit at the University of Western Sydney says introducing elephants would pose significant problems.

"If we did go down the road of introducing elephants to Australia, we had better develop the technology to clone saber-tooth tigers to eventually control the elephants," he said in a statement.

The biggest opposition to Bowman's suggestion though is likely to come from Australian quarantine authorities which impose some of the world's strictest requirements on the importation of animals. Currently the importation of both rhinos and elephants is prohibited under the Quarantine Act, according to a spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Animals destined for zoos may only be imported under special provisions.

Saharan Cheetah

The Saharan Cheetah




The Saharan Cheetah (also known as the Northwest African Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus hecki. These majestic and sleek animals differ from sub-Saharan cheetahs in the several ways. They're smaller, with coats that are shorter, whiter and have spots that fade from black (around the spine) to brown (around the legs). Their faces have fewer spots, and sometimes lack tear stripes. They have also adapted their behaviour to the incredibly arid and hot Sahara Desert by becoming more nocturnal than their sub-Saharan counterparts.

Their total population is believed to number 250 individuals, and they are classified by the IUCN as Critically Endangered. However, this is – at best – a guestimate, and remarkably little is known about these elusive animals. In an attempt to improve knowledge of the numbers, whereabouts and conservation concerns of Saharan Cheetahs, researchers from the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and the Office du Parc National de l’Ahaggar (OPNA) set out a 2800 km2 camera trap survey of the central Sahara. The images that these camera traps have taken have been nothing short of remarkable, and demonstrate how exceptionally useful camera traps can be.

























________________________________________



Friday, July 6, 2012

Going Ape

It’s a great pity that once highly respected National Geographic channel has degenerated into a purveyor of low brow entertainment with sensationalist programmes with titles like “Africa’s Most Dangerous Killers” and "Cat Wars".

Why, I wonder, do they find it necessary to trivialize our wonderful natural world and to pump up the drama of the various animal interactions. Is it to drum up viewership?
What’s happened to the excellent educational and informative communicator that National Geographic used to be?
It’s sadly been my experience that film-makers and researchers, generally, seem to hell bent on getting the shot or collecting the data and care little for how this is achieved. They seem not to be bothered about the well being of the wildlife they are researching or photographing. So, I’m really not surprised that National Geographic are being accused of a big set-up here in Pringle Bay to get dramatic footage of baboons raiding a house and to anthropomorphise the whole sequence..
Baboons that raid houses are an ever escalating problem here and it’s naïve or disingenuous for National Geographic to claim they were only attempting to get to portray how and when the baboons raid houses. The bottom line is that they have successfully reinforced the perception amongst the baboon troops here that a house that is not heavily fortified is an open invitation for a free lunch. 
Cape Times Editorial 5th July :- “ ……….….it is clear that the film-makers deliberately made food available to a troop of wild baboons to lure them into a house so they could film their behaviour”. “ We join CapeNature in voicing our disgust at this anthropomorphic and unscientific series that violates almost every established principle of ethical wildlife film-making”.

Shame on you National Geographic. You’ve become part of the problem instead of becoming part of the solution!



My photo
Professional wildlife guide, conservationist, student of Africa politics and observer of human foibles. My stamping grounds are the wilds of Zimbabwe, Zambia, Namibia, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, South Africa, Botswana, Madagascar and Cameroon and the Central Africa Republic. "Walking on the Wildside" is an attempt to share the stories of the adventures and anecdotes about the interesting people and animals I've collected along the way. www.callofafrica.co.za